Sessions faces grilling about Russia’s outreach to Trump campaign

Jeff Classes has come under intensifying scrutiny about his repeated denials or shifting answers regarding what he knew about the Trump campaign’s connections to Russia. | Jacquelyn Martin/AP Photo Classes faces grilling about Russia’s outreach to Trump plan House Democrats have previously signaled they have issues about Sessions’ accuracy.

After months of dismissing questions about the Kremlin’s meddling in the 2016 election, Jeff Classes on Tuesday will need to address latest revelations that he knew about some aspects of Russia’s outreach to Donald Trump’s campaign.

Members of the home judiciary committee have previously indicated they’ll ask the former Alabama senator about his role in meetings and conversations about Trump aides’ travels to Russia and efforts to set up a meeting between the then-Republican presidential nominee and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Story Continued Below

Sessions features come under intensifying scrutiny about his repeated denials or shifting answers to issues in what he knew about the Trump campaign’s connections to Russia. Included in this:

-During Sessions’ Jan. 10 confirmation hearing, the incoming lawyer general informed Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) that he “didn’t contain communications with the Russians.” He separately informed Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.) in writing that he had not been in contact with any Russian federal government officials about the election, but subsequent reviews showed that Sessions fulfilled at least twice with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the 2016 campaign.

-On June, Sessions told the Senate intelligence committee he had never discussed with Russians “any type of interference with any plan or election in america” and didn’t know of any such conversations by a person with the Trump campaign.

Playbook Power Briefing Sign up for our must-go through newsletter on what’s driving the afternoon in Washington. Email Sign Up By registering you agree to receive email news letters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

-Previous month, he told the Senate Judiciary Committee that he had zero “improper involvement” with Russians and that he never discussed anything that could possibly be construed as collusion. He also said he wasn’t alert to whether any plan surrogates possessed any interactions with Russians. “I did so not, and I’m unaware of other people that did,” he stated.

But a recent plea agreement reached by special counsel Robert Mueller’s crew and fresh testimony from a former Trump foreign insurance plan aide indicate Sessions did know of most contacts between plan officials and Russians.

In the plea handle George Papadopoulos, prosecutors stated the former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser – who admitted to lying to FBI agents about contacts with Russians – interacted with high-level campaign officials about those contacts. Papadopoulos informed prosecutors he brought up the notion of a gathering between Trump and Putin throughout a March 2016 appointment of the foreign insurance plan team, which was led by Sessions.

Sessions has not commented publicly, but people close to him have since said Sessions was first the main one who shot down the proposed appointment between Putin and Trump, who was simply also present for the conversation.

Another Trump campaign overseas policy aide, Carter Web page, later told Home investigators he had informed Sessions about his own trip to Moscow. He stated he described it to the then-senator carrying out a dinner at the Capitol Hill Golf club shortly before he remaining town.

House Democrats have previously signaled they have issues about Classes’ accuracy. In a letter from the judiciary committee’s 17 Democrats, the lawmakers described Classes’ statements as “inconsistencies” and told him to anticipate to answer for them.

The Alabaman also could face questions about Trump’s decision earlier this season to fire FBI Director James Comey, which the president later on said he did out of frustration with the Russia investigation. That firing, which Classes weighed in on despite having recused himself from all campaign-related matters, led to the appointment of Mueller as unique counsel.

Senate Democrats who have interrogated him remain frustrated by Classes’ evasion of questions that touch found on his non-public conversations with Trump about the problem, even though the president has not claimed the discussions were subject to executive privilege. Classes has stated he won’t discuss the conversations in the event Trump later on decides to case privilege.

Though Sessions, a former senator, has generally nice relationships with his former colleagues – including Democrats – he doesn’t have the same connection with House Democrats and could be in for a bruising, lengthy hearing. It’ll be considered a check of his endurance: there are 41 members of the committee who will each be offered an opportunity to question the Justice Department head.

Though Sessions’ answers on Russia is definitely the most anticipated of the hearing, he’ll also be pressed on a variety of high-stakes subjects that will extend the hearing further. Included in this: Trump’s public calls for DOJ to research Hillary Clinton, controversial surveillance applications dealt with by the FBI, terrorism, civil forfeiture, competition relations between law enforcement and minority communities, and allegations of sexual misconduct against Roy Moore, who is running for Sessions’ older Senate seat from Alabama.

Elana Schor and Josh Gerstein contributed to the report.

Read more on: http://www.politico.com