White Evangelicals Conflicted Found in Wake Of Roy Moore Accusations
Enlarge this photo toggle caption Scott Olson/Getty Pictures Scott Olson/Getty Images
With his U.S. Senate campaign in Alabama suddenly endangered by allegations he had sexually abused a, GOP candidate Roy Moore sought to carefully turn the crisis to his political benefit by portraying it as an “Us vs. Them” confrontation.
“We are amid a spiritual struggle with those who need to silence our communication,” he tweeted.
Throughout his career as an Alabama judge, Moore has been regarded as a staunch conservative Christian, and some of his evangelical supporters immediately rushed to his defense. One state poll last week advised the harassment allegation possesses actually strengthened his support among Alabama evangelicals; those who said it built them more likely to aid Moore essentially outnumbered those who said it built them less likely.
Outside Alabama, however, various evangelicals are troubled. Conservative Christians have prolonged railed against the evils of secular liberalism, and studies of sexual misconduct by Hollywood celebrities have fueled that narrative. With those misconduct expenses now leveled against one of their own, evangelicals find themselves in a difficult position.
“This is simply not something [where] we are able to say, ‘This doesn’t eventually us, because we’re very good and they’re undesirable,'” says Katelyn Beaty, editor-at-large for Christianity Today, the magazine founded by evangelist Billy Graham. “This happens in every institution and in every community, and we would get naïve to think it doesn’t happen among, quote-unquote, our people.'”
Indeed, the evangelical network may involve some issues of its own where sexual harassment can be involved. When Kathryn Brightbill find out about Moore’s pursuit of teen-age girls, it cut back remembrances of what she experienced encountered growing up in a fundamentalist Christian network.
“As an adolescent, I attended a good lecture about courtship by a good home-university speaker who was simply popular at that time,” Brightbill wrote found in a good commentary published by the Los Angeles Moments. “He praised the thought of ‘early courtship’ so the girl could possibly be molded into the best possible helpmeet for her husband to be.”
Following the column was published, other evangelical women wrote Brightbill to talk about similar experiences.
“I’m hearing a lot of testimonies,” Brightbill told NPR, “with people saying, ‘I found this take up out in my own church or home university network.’ Often, it includes youth pastors becoming associated with 14- or 15-year-old girls.”
Even prior to the Roy Moore case, evangelical Christians have been challenged over their apparent tolerance for sexual misconduct among politicians allied with their cause. Exit polls advised that about 80 percent of white colored evangelicals supported Donald Trump in the 2016 election, despite his multiple marriages and boasts of sexual conquest.
An oft-cited poll by the PRRI survey firm discovered that whereas only thirty percent of white colored evangelicals in 2011 thought elected officials who commit an immoral act could nonetheless fulfill their public duties, that talk about rose to 72 percent in 2016.
“This dramatic abandonment of the complete idea of ‘value voters’ is among the most stunning reversals found in recent American political background,” says Robert P. Jones, the survey firm’s CEO. “There has been this shift from a kind of values- or principle-based political ethic to a utilitarian political ethic, where the ends justify the means.”
The willingness of white evangelicals to forget the transgressions of their recommended politicians troubles a few of their leaders. Russell Moore, president of the Ethics and Spiritual Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, chided his fellow evangelicals for supporting Trump during the presidential campaign, and in the aftermath of the allegations concerning Roy Moore (no relation), he again expressed his dismay.
“Christian, if you fail to say definitively, regardless of what, that people creeping on teenage girls is wrong, usually do not tell myself how you stand against moral relativism,” Moore tweeted.
He was not alone found in decrying the evangelical support for Judge Moore. Ed Stetzer, executive director of the Billy Graham Center for Evangelism, known obliquely to the Moore case during a sermon Sunday at the Moody Church in Chicago.
“When somebody comes and says, ‘Me too,’ [or when] somebody comes and says, ‘I’ve been harm’ or ‘I’ve been harassed’ or ‘I’ve been abused,’ in some cases the response is certainly to protect something or an individual,” he said. He told worshipers that the proper Christian response in such a situation is to say, “I really believe you,” and express mercy.
Stetzer was first especially critical of Alabama Point out Auditor Jim Zeigler, who actually Stetzer said was first “nearly blasphemous” for comparing Judge Moore’s alleged dalliance with girls to the biblical story of Joseph and Mary, the mom of Jesus, because Joseph was first supposedly a grown-up and Mary was an adolescent when they married.
“A lot of people are wondering, ‘What carry out these crazy Christians believe?’ and that only fed into a narrative,” Stetzer told NPR. “Somebody’s only gotta say, ‘This isn’t what we believe.'”
For a few evangelical women who may be working with sexual harassment, the task presented by the accusations against Judge Moore is especially acute.
“Individuals who have had this kind of trauma previously are looking to see the reaction of the church,” says Morgan Lee, who hosts a podcast for Christianity Today. “It’s identifying whether [the church] is certainly something they can put their trust in, or [whether they] leave feeling more cynical.