5 Takeaways from a TimesTalk About Weinstein, O’Reilly and Sexual Harassment

“I believe what that story displays is how there really was a organization calculation that was being made at these businesses,” Ms. Metal said. “They noticed that Roger Ailes got simply left. Megyn Kelly got just left. Expenses O’Reilly was their most significant star and he pulled in vast sums of dollars a time for them. And that was more important to them at that time.”

For Ms. Kantor and Ms. Twohey, examining the system that Mr. Weinstein constructed – one packed with attorneys, brokers and assistants – to shame, silence and coerce victims was the next phase after the first story was published.

“We can’t just drop by type of revealing allegations against individuals,” Ms. Twohey said. “We must start to kind of piece together and peel again the layers of systemic failures and genuinely push this conversation frontward into solutions. Not just systemic failures but systemic solutions.”

Patterns of abuse are often similar.

Reporters on both the Weinstein and O’Reilly conditions say they were struck by a routine. In Mr. O’Reilly’s circumstance, he’d offer women publicity or careers with Fox, Ms. Metal said.

In 2013, Mr. O’Reilly attemptedto invite a woman, Wendy Walsh, back again to his hotel room after giving her profession information. When Ms. Walsh switched him down, he retaliated by receiving her dropped as a guest on his present and rescinding his offer to create her a network contributor. She did not report the show out of concern with jeopardizing her career.

“There are a great number of systems in place that allowed these men to continue to perpetuate this harassment against women,” Ms. Metal said, “and get away with it.”

Of Mr. Weinstein, who sometimes used assistants to accompany women of all ages to resort suites before leaving them only with him, Ms. Kantor said, “It had been eerie how comparable the stories of predation had been,” despite speaking to women of differing backgrounds, age ranges and eras of Mr. Weinstein’s career.

Advertisement Continue reading the main story

“He was calculated,” Ms. Twohey said. “He was very wise in creating allegiances and romantic relationships throughout a variety of industries that he used as cover for his bad tendencies.”

Examining what’s at stake intended for the victims – and reporters.

The high-profile men at the guts of these stories weren’t afraid to intimidate their victims, or the reporters who worked to reveal abuse. Ms. Metal recounted an earlier dialogue with Mr. O’Reilly on an unrelated story, where he threatened to follow her “with everything he had.”

“It did help me know how it may be to be on the other end of a threatening telephone call from O’Reilly,” Ms. Metal said, “or how he’d respond in some situations.”

Newsletter Sign Up Read on the key story Please verify you’re not a robot by clicking the container. Invalid email. Please re-enter. You must select a newsletter to subscribe to. SUBSCRIBE You consent to receive occasional updates and special deals for The New York Times’s products and services. Thank you for subscribing. One has occurred. Please make an effort again later. View all New York Times newsletters.

Ms. Kantor, who was simply at one point subject to intimidation from Mr. Weinstein’s self-built safety network, said that the larger fear on her behalf was endangering sources, a few of whom were not renowned and who got risked their livelihoods to speak out.

In the end, both she and Ms. Twohey said, worries of inability drove the reporting frontward; they did not want Mr. Weinstein’s methods of intimidation to function.

“We have felt the greatest good sense of journalistic and moral responsibility,” Ms. Kantor said. “The prospect that people could’ve failed, that people could’ve known this materials yet not been able to create it, and walked around for the rest of our lives possessing this terrible secret and not being able to talk about it with anybody, that was the truly scary the main process.”

Ms. Judd, who was simply a goal of Mr. Weinstein’s information-gathering attempts against his accusers, said that she was ready for the outcome.

“There was definitely a gap somewhere between ‘this is easy, here is the right move to make,’” Ms. Judd said, “and ‘something really big is getting prepared to happen.’”

She said that one result of speaking out could have been a libel lawsuit against her, but she considered the alternative.

Advertisement Continue reading the main story

“Maybe the change was going to be that of the girls and women who was simply afflicted by Harvey in these harming and obnoxious methods would come together with women across all spaces and sectors and industries,” Ms. Judd said, “and say basta – more than enough is enough.”

Harassment does not occur just in high-profile industries.

With stories of sexual abuse spilling out of Hollywood, Congress and the news headlines media, reporters must grapple with a related issue: the abuse occurring in lower-account industries, where employees have even fewer avenues of recourse.

“It does feel like there is a lot more journalistic work to do in various places at the other end of the economical spectrum,” Ms. Kantor said. “I do think that part of what is important about these high-profile mass media and Hollywood stories is that so lots of the guys who have a history of these allegations, they were our culture’s storytellers.”

Where does the movement go from here?

It’s an instant that feels like a national reckoning, but a huge question possesses appeared: Will the stories about Mr. Weinstein, Mr. O’Reilly and others take about lasting change?

“All I could say is we can see things given that we were under no circumstances able to see before,” Ms. Kantor said. “You can now really see the habits,” including that women are usually abused early on within their careers, in episodes that may sometimes change their profession trajectory.

Another prominent case in point, she said, may be the latest scrutiny over confidential legal settlements – a tactic which has always been used from Hollywood to Capitol Hill to erase disputes – and if they really protect the abused or if they enable predation to continue unabated.

“On a collective level,” Ms. Kantor said, “it doesn’t go away at all.”

Read more on: http://nytimes.com