“It’s like out of control spending has a superhero bodyguard and its own brand is ‘government shutdown.'”
The con game works such as this: The government keeps expanding and expanding. New departments and spending courses are introduced with regularity. But somehow they promptly turn into sacred cows as though that they had existed since 1776.
Deficits keep rising even though incoming revenues break record after record. But we’re told the only reasonable way to cut the credit debt is increase revenues. Whenever anyone questions the necessity or oversight for fresh spending, the word “emergency” is slapped about it, so reasonable caution – and the people asking for it – happen to be disregarded and possibly demonized.
The federal government shutdown scam wraps each of the above elements into one stinky package. First of all, it uses the hyperbolic and 85 percent inaccurate “shutdown” title. Second, it always includes fast-approaching deadlines, (this most up-to-date one is December 8th), that discourage any fair-minded critics from asking for considerably more scrutiny. Third, the “option” is always linked to agreeing to considerably more spending, instead of an across-the-board spending lower of any kind.
It’s like out of control spending has a superhero bodyguard and its own name is “authorities shutdown.”
But there’s one more thing that makes authorities shutdown battles a particularly egregious exemplory case of D.C. dishonesty. That is, they’re usually not really about spending at all. They contain historically grown out of debates over partisan wedge problems incorporating abortion, oil drilling, and civil rights.
That last shutdown in 2013 was about Obamacare. This time, the face-off is more and more about a dispute on immigration. However the Constitution connects nearly every government policy to the Congressional ability of the purse. So it is easy for political opportunists to consider the budget and put it to use as a hostage every time they have plenty of will to do so.
When that happens, using the problem of our exploding debts and unfunded near future liabilities gets kicked down the road again simply by hysterical and grave sounding politicians and their enablers found in most of the news headlines media. They make certain that no matter how inconsequential “shutdowns” really are, they happen to be perceived by the public as dire.
But try thinking back again to that last shutdown when it happened from October 1 to October 17, 2013. Don’t merely trust your raw remembrances, check your emails or social media articles from that time period for help. See if indeed they provide any evidence of your life in tatters and a nation in chaos. The guess here is that you will see no such facts for the overwhelming most you.
That is where the danger seriously lies for the political school and organization as usual in Washington. That is, this rip-off is in danger if considerably more voters, and the people supposedly keeping our political leaders up to scrutiny, would just glance at these shutdown threats considerably more clearly. Then, at least that incredibly key level of the Washington budget con game would be peeled away.
Yes, both get-togethers are to blame. But until voters on all sides begin to contact baloney on the shutdown scare tactic, expect considerably more of the hyperbole, half truths, and deflection from the real issues to continue.
The only method it ends is if Americans get yourself a healthy and timely dose of skepticism.
Commentary simply by Jake Novak, CNBC.com senior columnist. Comply with him on Twitter @jakejakeny.
For considerably more insight from CNBC contributors, follow @CNBCopinion on Twitter.